FUZZY RULE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF UNCERTAINTY FACTORS IN DEEPFAKE CLASSIFICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65164/1pg9sc73Keywords:
Fuzzy logic; Deepfake detection; Uncertainty factors; Expert system, Multimedia security.Abstract
This study proposes a fuzzy logic–based expert system for evaluating uncertainty factors in deepfake image and video classification. Traditional classifiers rely primarily on prediction accuracy and often fail under non-ideal visual conditions, such as poor illumination, unstable face pose, or compression artifacts. The proposed system models three critical factors—classifier accuracy, illumination quality, and face stability—using linguistic membership functions (low, medium, high) and applies Mamdani-type fuzzy inference rules to compute a final Confidence Score. Experimental analysis shows that the fuzzy decision layer significantly improves reliability, especially in borderline cases where the model accuracy alone is insufficient to make a trustworthy conclusion. By integrating scene-quality attributes, the system reduces misclassification and provides transparent decision-making logic. This framework enhances the robustness of deepfake detection and can be effectively applied in digital forensics, security inspection, media validation, and real-time monitoring applications.
References
1. M. Tolosana, R. Vera-Rodriguez, J. Fierrez, A. Morales, and J. Ortega-Garcia, “Deepfakes and
beyond: A survey of face manipulation and fake detection,” *Information Fusion*, vol. 64, pp.
131–148, 2020.
2. Diel et al., “Human performance in detecting deepfakes: A systematic review and meta-analysis
of 56 papers,” *Computers in Human Behavior Reports*, vol. 16, p. 100538, 2024.
3. F. Chollet, “Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions,” in *Proc. IEEE
Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)*, 2017, pp. 1251–1258.
4. M. Tan and Q. Le, “EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks,”
in *Proc. Int. Conf. Machine Learning (ICML)*, 2019, pp. 6105–6114.
5. S. Xie, R. Girshick, P. Dollár, Z. Tu, and K. He, “Aggregated residual transformations for deep
neural networks,” in *Proc. IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)*,
2017, pp. 1492–1500.
6. van Gansbeke, A. Dhoedt, and J. Van de Weijer, “Temporal awareness in deepfake detection,”
*IEEE Trans. Biometrics, Behavior, and Identity Science*, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 176–187, 2021.
7. S. Tipper, H. F. Atlam, and H. S. Lallie, “An investigation into the utilisation of CNN with LSTM
for video deepfake detection,” *Applied Sciences*, vol. 14, no. 21, p. 9754, 2024.
8. Maxmudjanov Sarvar, Primbetov Abbaz Muratbay Uli, and Naimov Axadjon Tojimirza O‘G‘Li.
"DEEPFAKE DETECTION USING A HYBRID RESNEXT AND LSTM ARCHITECTURE."
Al-Farg’oniy avlodlari 1.2 (2025): 87-94