Representation of national color in phraseological terms: A comparative analysis of English and Uzbek
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65164/ztdz1b23Ключевые слова:
phraseological unit, national color, linguacultural, comparative linguistics, semantic equivalence, metaphorical phraseologism, metonymic phraseologism, cultural lacuna, translation studies.Аннотация
This study aims to comparatively analyze phraseological units in Uzbek and English from a
linguacultural perspective, to identify the mechanisms and typology through which national color is expressed
in phraseological terminology, and to demonstrate the potential application of findings in translation practice
and foreign-language teaching methodology.The research employed a mixed-methods design integrating
qualitative and quantitative analysis. Comparative-typological, descriptive-analytical, contextual, and
componential analysis methods were applied alongside content analysis and a linguacultural approach. Over
120 phraseological units were selected from Uzbek and English reference dictionaries and literary text
corpora. Findings were validated by three independent expert raters . The findings demonstrate the necessity of
developing linguacultural competence in foreign-language pedagogy, applying specialized strategies for
phraseological lacunae in translation, and incorporating cultural glosses into bilingual phraseological
dictionaries.
Библиографические ссылки
1. Vinogradov, V. V. (1977). "The Main Types of Phraseological Units in the Russian Language". Moscow:
2. Rahmatullayev, Sh. (1992). Oʻzbek tilining izohli frazeologik lugʻati. Tashkent: Oʻqituvchi.
3. Telia, V. N. (1996). Russian Phraseology: Semantic, Pragmatic, and Linguocultural Aspects. Moscow: .
4. Maslova, V. A. (2001). Lingvokulturologiya. Moscow: Akademiya.
5. Apresyan, Yu. D. (1995). Selected Works. Volume II. Integral Description of Language and Systematic
Lexicography. Moscow.
6. Makkai, A. (1972). Idiom Structure in English. The Hague: Mouton.
7. Sinclair, J. (1991). Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Cowie, A. P. (1998). Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Moon, R. (1998). Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: A Corpus-Based Approach. Oxford: Clarendon
Press.
10.Hojiyev, A. (2002). Tilshunoslik terminlarining izohli lugʻati. Tashkent: Oʻzbekiston Milliy
Ensiklopediyasi.
11.Yoʻldoshev, B. (2006). Frazeologiya va frazeografiya asoslari. Tashkent: Fan.
12. Mahmudov, N. (2010). Til va madaniyat. Tashkent: Maʼnaviyat.
13.Berelson, B. (1952). Content Analysis in Communication Research. New York: Free Press.
14. Kunin, A. V. (1984). English-Russian Phraseological Dictionary. Moscow.
15. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and
Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
16.Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.Nida, E. A. (1964). Toward a Science of Translating. Leiden: Brill.
18.Baker, M. (1992). In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. London: Routledge.
19.Newmark, P. (1988). A Textbook of Translation. London: Prentice Hall.
20.Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding Cultures Through Their Key Words. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
21.Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt Brace.
22.Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.Isayeva, M. M. (2026). Representation of National Color in Phraseological Terms: A Comparative
Analysis of English and Uzbek. Tashkent: Tashkent University of Applied Sciences.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия
Copyright (c) 2026 Журнал «Социальные науки: теория и практика»
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives» («Атрибуция — Некоммерческое использование — Без производных произведений») 4.0 Всемирная.
