METHODOLOGICAL RECOMMENDATIONS ON IMPLEMENTING MODERN INTERACTIVE AND DIGITAL METHODS IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING FOR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN UZBEKISTAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65164/xacjrm19Kalit so‘zlar:
English language teaching, interactive methods, digital technologies, university students, blended learning, gamification, Uzbekistan higher education, CEFR, artificial intelligence in ELTAbstrak
The rapid development of digital technologies and the increasing demand for English language proficiency in higher education have necessitated the modernization of teaching methodologies in Uzbekistan. This paper presents methodological recommendations for implementing interactive and digital methods in English language teaching (ELT) for university students. The study highlights the current state of English language education in Uzbek universities, identifies existing challenges, and proposes practical ways to integrate modern approaches such as Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT), blended learning, gamification, and artificial intelligence tools.
Havolalar
1. Al-Dosakee, K., & Ozdamli, F. (2021). Gamification in teaching and learning languages: A systematic literature review. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(2), 559–577. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.2/436
2. British Council. (2024). Artificial intelligence and English language teaching: A systematic review. British Council. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk
3. Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2024). AI and English language teaching: Affordances and challenges. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13460
4. Daud, A., et al. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence into English language teaching: A systematic review. European Journal of Educational Research.
5. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
6. Harmer, J. (2015). The practice of English language teaching (5th ed.). Pearson.
7. Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. Cambridge Adult Education.
8. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
9. Shortt, M., et al. (2023). Gamification in mobile-assisted language learning: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1933540
10. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
11. Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Longman.
12. Abdullaev, R. (2021). The impact of national independence and globalization on foreign language teaching in Uzbekistan. ERIC.
13. Ashraf, M. A., et al. (2021). A systematic review of systematic reviews on blended learning. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
781
14. Musoeva, A. (2021). What do Uzbekistani EFL teachers know and believe about the usefulness of the CEFR? International Journal of Research.
15. Ramalingam, S., et al. (2022). Blended learning strategies for sustainable English as a second language education. Sustainability, 14(13), 8051. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138051
16. Tolibjonov, B. (2020). Teaching and learning foreign languages in Uzbekistan: CEFR, learning, teaching and assessment.
17. Zou, B., et al. (2023). Artificial intelligence in language education. Computers & Education.
