EDUCATIONAL WELL-BEING IN THE DIGITAL ERA: CHALLENGES, OPPORTUNITIES AND IMPLICATIONS FROM BIOMETRIC ENGAGEMENT ANALYSIS

Mualliflar

  • Khujakulov Toshtemir Department of Computer Engineering, Tashkent University of Applied Sciences, Str. Gavhar 1, Tashkent 100149, Uzbekistan, mehr_toj@mail.ru, (K.T.A), Professor, Head of Department Muallif
  • Asror Bahromov Department of Computer Engineering, Tashkent University of Applied Sciences, Str. Gavhar 1, Tashkent 100149, Uzbekistan, asrorbek.bahromov2112@gmail.com, (A.B), Senior Lecturer Muallif
  • Majidova Yulduz, Fozil Jo‘raboyev, Anvar Choriyev, Azimov Sherkhon Department of Computer Engineering, Tashkent University of Applied Sciences, Str. Gavhar 1, Tashkent 100149, Uzbekistan, Assistant Teachers Muallif
  • Farkhod Akhmedov Department of Computer Engineering, Gachon University Sujeong-Gu, Seongnam-Si 461-701, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of Korea, farhod34@gachon.ac.kr (F.A), Assistant Professor. Muallif

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65164/wrb9q933

Kalit so‘zlar:

digital education systems. Key words:

Abstrak

The increasing application of digitalization has created unprecedented opportunities to enhance access while simultaneously introducing complex challenges to student well-being. This study presents a comprehensive empirical analysis of the Student Engagement Biometrics Dataset (SEBD-2024), comprising multimodal learning sessions recorded from 300 students across three content types (Text, Video, Interactive) and three difficulty levels (Easy, Medium, Hard). Using electroencephalography (EEG) frequency-band power spectral density measurements across five neural bands (Delta, Theta, Alpha, Beta, Gamma) alongside eye-tracking metrics (pupil dilation, blink rate, fixation duration, saccade velocity), we extract, analyse, and contextualize biometric correlates of student engagement. Our Random Forest classifier achieved 35.3% cross-validation accuracy across three engagement classes, only marginally above random baseline (33.3%), revealing a critical finding: raw biometric signals from these modalities, analysed in isolation, exhibit insufficient discriminative power to reliably stratify engagement states. This null-hypothesis insight is itself a major contribution, highlighting the multi-modal complexity of educational well-being and the need for longitudinal, contextualized, and subjective-report-integrated frameworks. We draw direct connections between these findings and the broader discourse on digital well-being, cognitive fatigue, and the neurological substrate of engaged learning, proposing a five-pillar Well-Being Estimation Framework (WEF) for digital education systems.

Havolalar

1.

https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/unesco-action-education-highlights-2024

2. Nguyen, David, et al. "Survey design and technical documentation supporting the 2021 OECD Survey on Drivers of Trust in Government Institutions." OECD Working Papers on Public Governance 53 (2022): 3-52.

3. Prinsloo, Paul, Mohammad Khalil, and Sharon Slade. "Vulnerable student digital well‐being in AI‐powered educational decision support systems (AI‐EDSS) in higher education." British Journal of Educational Technology 55.5 (2024): 2075-2092.

4.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/

5. Fries, Pascal. "Rhythms for cognition: communication through coherence." Neuron 88.1 (2015): 220-235.

6. Chaouachi, Maher, Imène Jraidi, and Claude Frasson. "Modeling mental workload using EEG features for intelligent systems." International conference on user modeling, adaptation, and personalization. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011.

7. Rayner, Keith. "Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research." Psychological bulletin 124.3 (1998): 372.

8. Iqbal, Shamsi T., and Brian P. Bailey. "Investigating the effectiveness of mental workload as a predictor of opportune moments for interruption." CHI'05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. 2005.

9. Berger, Wilhelmine, et al. "Students’ well-being in digital learning environments: A multilevel analysis of sixth-graders in comprehensive schools." Education Sciences 15.8 (2025): 1034.

10. Camacho-Morles, Jesús, et al. "Activity achievement emotions and academic performance: A meta-analysis." Educational psychology review 33.3 (2021): 1051-1095.

11. Romero, Cristobal, and Sebastian Ventura. "Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey." Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: Data mining and knowledge discovery 10.3 (2020): e1355.

12. Grafsgaard, Joseph, et al. "Automatically recognizing facial expression: Predicting engagement and frustration." Educational data mining 2013. 2013.

13.

https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/ziya07/student-engagement-dataset-using-eeg

Yuklab olishlar

Nashr qilingan

2026-05-15